Bakhmut... 24 May 23.

There is a concentration of ROV forces and equipment in Bakhmut, which indicates that further actions are being prepared outside the city. Tomorrow, May 25, according to statements by Prigozhin, the "Wagnerites" will have to leave the city.

Will they?

I am sure they will not. Another chaos.

There is practically no fighting in the city itself, which is both surprising and unsurprising at the same time. The fact is that so far the ROV has not taken control of a small area in the southwestern sector of the city, along Chaikovsky and Korsunsky Streets, which rests on the remains of the "airplane."

The ROV does not seem eager to resolve the issue of closing the southwestern gate to the city, but instead concentrates on upcoming battles in other directions. Although, the occupants are shelling Ivanovskoye with artillery non-stop, which is so indicative of their plans to advance in this direction.

In turn, СОУ🇺🇦, thanks to the advance in the South-West sector and the return of the dominant heights under their control, effectively respond to these shellings. In essence, Bakhmut has now entered the phase of an artillery duel, rather than urban combat.

The situation outside the city is also moving into a new phase.

The advance of SOU in the NW and SW locations has slowed somewhat, which is due to our units coming into certain close proximity to Berkhovka and Kleshchyivka. Next will be a phase of preliminary preparation and a quite predictable chain of events.

Thus, the ROV, having captured most of Bakhmut, did not gain any tactical, let alone strategic, advantage. Moreover, the processes taking place on the flanks of the ROV cannot be stopped. Now the decision is being made to redeploy forces and means from other locations. But...

But such redeployments will lead to a weakening of the PSO in these locations with, again, quite predictable chain of events.

Thus, having driven themselves into Bakhmut, the Russians begin to tolerate and weaken the other sites along the way, so that they are not so lonely to tolerate.

Glory to the nation!

"Why wouldn't I want Putin dead"

In recent years, there has been a lot of controversy and discussion surrounding Russian President Vladimir Putin. Opinions about his politics, attitude to human rights and influence on the world stage divide people into different camps. In this context, you can often hear phrases about Putin's death wish, as a justification or punishment for his actions. However, while such statements may be emotionally understandable, they cannot justify violence or be supported as a viable political strategy. In this article, we will consider several arguments against expressing such desires.

1. Basic principles of human rights: Regardless of what political beliefs we have, it is worth remembering that every person has the right to life and security. These principles are enshrined in international documents such as the All-Agency Declaration on Human Rights. Expressing a death wish to any person, including Putin, goes against these universal principles and undermines our common trust in human rights.

2. Morality and ethics: It is important to understand that expressing the death wish of another person does not solve anything and does not make a constructive contribution to political or social change. Moreover, such statements can lead to further escalation of tension and violence, which does not lead to anything good. It is important to focus on peace building, dialogue and cooperation, not propagandaviolence or death wishes.

3. Democracy and change of power:Disagreement with the policies and actions of a particular leader should be expressed through peaceful means such as elections, public activism and constructive criticism. Democracy allows people to choose their leaders and change the country's political course without violence or a death wish.

In conclusion, it is important to understand that wishing the death of any person, regardless of political position, is not a constructive approach to political discussion and social change. It is important to direct our energies towards building peace, democracy and development, and to use peaceful and effective means to express our views and fight for the changes we believe are necessary.

May our actions and words promote constructive change and development, not fuel violence and enmity.

I understand that you can ask the question in the context of democratic values ​​and the desire to see the victory of democracy over dictatorship. The implementation of democratic change and the expansion of democratic values ​​are goals to which many people in the world aspire.

However, it is important to consider that expressions of death wishes to a specific person, even as a symbol of an undemocratic regime, still remain controversial. This goes beyond constructive political discourse and the norms of a democratic society.

Instead, effective ways to fight against undemocratic regimes include supporting democratic movements and opposition, building diplomatic pressure, sanctions, public activism, information campaigns, and other non-conflictual means. The main goal should be to support democratic values, protect human rights, change the political course and promote positive changes in society.

In addition, it is worth remembering that democratic changes cannot be violent or externally imposed. The democratization process itself must be an internal initiative of society, taking into account the specific conditions and context of the country.

In the pursuit of democracy and a change in the political course, it is important to understand that success requires tolerance, constructive dialogue and the desire to involve broad sections of society in the process.

I understand your concern and the conversation in the context of the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. The situation in Ukraine is serious and complex, and the international community has indeed expressed support for Ukraine in its efforts to protect its territorial integrity and sovereignty.

However, it is important to consider that both the model of power and the issue of leadership are complex and multifaceted. The resolution of the conflict and the achievement of victory is not limited to the replacement of leaders. It requires a comprehensive approach that includes diplomatic efforts, international cooperation, political negotiations, humanitarian assistance and post-conflict reconstruction.

In particular, when it comes to democratic values, it is important to focus on building strong democratic institutions, protecting human rights and freedom, ensuring justice and the rule of law. Democracy implies inclusion, diversity of views and respect for human rights. This creates the basis for a stable society and guarantees the protection of the interests of the population.

There are many models of government in the world, and each country has the right to choose its own path. However, it is important to remember that any changes in the political system must be the result of an internal process and the will of citizens.

In the context of the conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, it is important to strive for a peaceful settlement, observingthere are principles of international law and efforts to involve the parties in negotiations. The main goal should be to ensure peace, stability and well-being for all the peoples of the region.

When analyzing the military aspect in terms of strength and stability of the leader, several aspects can be considered.

1. Military strength and security: A strong leader, particularly a military leader, can have certain advantages in ensuring the military strength and security of his country. He may have experience managing military forces and assets, allowing him to better utilize his army's resources and capabilities. However, this does not mean that a weak leader automatically leads to military inefficiency or vulnerability. Effectiveness depends on many factors, such as the professionalism of the military command, the availability of modern military equipment and integration with strategic partners.

2. International relations and allies: In the military context, interaction and cooperation with other countries, as well as the establishment of strategic alliances, are important. In the case of a weak leader, there may be problems with strengthening international relations and gaining the support of allies. However, it also depends on the political situation and context, as well as the geopolitical importance of the country.

3. Flexibility and adaptability: Military situations and threats can change rapidly, and an important aspect is the flexibility and adaptability of military leadership. This means the ability to adequately respond to changes, sv

able to make decisions and effectively use available resources. Whether a weak leader will be successful in this aspect depends on his management skills, abilities and determination.

It is worth noting that the military situation and the success of leadership depend on many factors, and not only on the strength or weakness of the leader himself. This includes aspects such as country resources, popular support, effectiveness of military strategy and tactics, and favorable external conditions.

The political situation and leadership assessment of relative advantage require in-depth analysis and consideration of many factors. The answer to your question can be complex because it requires consideration of political, social and economic aspects.

On the one hand, there is a view that a weak leader, particularly in the area of ​​democracy and justice, can ensure the stability and preservation of the existing political and social environment. This may be particularly important for those with vested interests in preserving the status quo. However, it can also limit progress, change and development in society.

On the other hand, strong, confident, experienced and intelligent leaders can have the potential to bring about positive change, ensure progress and development, and build a just and democratic system. They can work to strengthen human rights, develop the economy, fight corruption and ensure justice for all citizens.

However, it is worth noting that benefit assessment and policy decision-making is a complex process, and it may differ depending on the interests and beliefs of different people. Furthermore, it is important to distinguish between what is beneficial to individuals or particular groups and what is beneficial to society as a whole.

Ultimately, evaluating the benefits and role of a leader requires in-depth analysis

, reasoned discussion and consideration of various factors. Democracy, justice and societal development are complex issues and require careful study and balanced approaches.

I understand your concerns and desire to know the arguments for strategic planning and the influence of a leader like Putin on military victory and political settlement inpost-war period of international relations. Let's analyze these aspects:

Arguments "for" Putin in terms of military-political leadership:

1. Management experience: Putin has considerable experience in managing the Russian Federation, including military operations and international relations. His knowledge and understanding can be used to develop strategies aimed at achieving military victory and political influence.

2. Preservation of imperial interests: Putin actively supports Russia's interests as a world power, in particular by expanding influence in his sphere of influence. Its strategic planning can contribute to preserving Russia's interests and maintaining its status on the world stage.

3. Strengthening defense capabilities: Putin pays considerable attention to strengthening Russia's military capabilities. This can provide military advantage and increase the chances of military victory in the event of a conflict.

Arguments "against" Putin in terms of military-political leadership:

1. Democracy and human rights: Putin's critics point to his authoritarian style of governance and restrictions on freedom of speech and human rights. This can lead to internal tensions and disagreements, which canwill affect the country's stability and military effectiveness.

2. Foreign relations: Russia's actions under Putin have caused tensions in international relations and conflicts with other countries. This may lead to the isolation of Russia and more difficult settlement of conflicts inpost-war period

3. Military preparations: Increased military spending and Russia's activity may cause armed conflicts and escalation of tensions in the region and the world. This can have negative consequences for security and peace.

It is worth noting that these are only general arguments, and the assessment of political and military leaders requires a deep analysis of the situation and many other factors. There are no unequivocal solutions in military and political affairs, and each situation requires separate study and consideration.

The goal of every leader should be to ensure peace, stability and prosperity for his country and its citizens. The final conclusion about Putin and his influence on military victory and political settlement is left to the discretion of each individual analyst and citizen.

Management experience, particularly military experience, can be important in the context of planning and countermeasures. Some of the possible benefits associated with Putin's experience governing may include:

1. Understanding military strategies: Putin has experience in developing and executing military strategies. This can help in analyzing enemy strategies, predicting possible moves, and developing your own strategies.

2. International relations: Managing the Russian Federation gave Putin knowledge and experience in conducting international relations. This can be useful in planning political influence and using diplomatic efforts to achieve one's goals.

3. Crisis management: Putin has experience in crisis management, including military operations. This can be useful in developing and implementing countermeasure strategies in the event of a conflict or threat.

However, it is important to note that the effective use of this experience depends on many factors, such as the current situation, available resources, the level of training of the military forces and coordination between different structures. In addition, considering alternative strategies and the merits of different approaches can also be useful in understanding the wider context and choosing the most effective course of action.

Given your perspective and awareness of the current situation, you can channel the pains detailed analysis and draw conclusions on how to use this experience in specific military planning and countermeasures.

"Preservation of imperial interests: Putin actively supports Russia's interests as a world power, in particular by expanding influence in his sphere of influence. His strategic planning can help preserve Russia's interests and maintain its status on the world stage.

Putin's management experience may have some advantages in this regard. It focuses on strengthening Russia's geopolitical position, ensuring access to resources and control over strategically important regions. His political will and determination can stimulate actions aimed at achieving these goals.

However, it is worth noting that the preservation of imperial interests can cause tension in international relations and conflicts with other countries. Maintaining status on the world stage can require great efforts, including military operations and political manipulation.

It is important to consider alternative approaches and solutions that can lead to a more peaceful and stable world. Much more constructive can be cooperation, diplomacy and the development of international agreements that will contribute to common prosperity and security.

Therefore, when planning strategies for military operations and political settlement on the world stage, it is important to carefully analyze the possible consequences and find a balance between the state's interests and peacemaking efforts. Justice

, stability and security should be fundamental principles in any strategic decisions."

"Strengthening Defense Capability: Putin has placed considerable emphasis on strengthening Russia's military capabilities. This can provide military superiority and increase the chances of military victory in the event of a conflict.

Strengthening defense capabilities is an important aspect of national security and military strategy. Russia, having strong military capabilities, can protect its national interests, demonstrate its readiness to defend its territory and ensure stability in the region.

However, it is worth considering that the strengthening of military capabilities can lead to an escalation of the conflict and an increase in the risk of military actions. This can provoke tension in international relations and cause indignation on the part of other countries.

When planning strategies in the military sphere, it is necessary to balance the strengthening of defense capabilities with diplomatic and peacemaking efforts. The development of trusting relationships, cooperation and the search for a political settlement can be constructive ways to ensure peace and stability.

It is important to remember that political settlement and diplomatic efforts can prove to be effective solutions to conflicts and achieve peace, which will contribute to prosperity and stability not only for Russia, but for the whole world. Security and coexistence should be priorities in strategic planning

anni."

"Democracy and human rights: Putin's critics point to his authoritarian style of governance and restrictions on freedom of speech and human rights. This can lead to internal tensions and disagreements that can affect the country's stability and military effectiveness.

Restrictions on freedom of speech and human rights can undermine the legitimacy and support of a government in its own country, as well as violate international standards. Insufficient public participation and restrictions on political freedoms can lead to protests, mass discontent and social conflicts. This can distract attention from the military effort and worsen the state of the internal armed conflict.

In addition, the lack of democratic processes and restrictions on human rights can affect international cooperation and partnership. Countries that support democratic values ​​and human rights may be more cautious in cooperating with an authoritarian regime, which may limit opportunities for international settlement and partnership.

In the context of military planning and countermeasures, domestic instability and discontent can affect military effectiveness. Internal tensions can divert government attention and resources, which can lead to a reduction in military readiness and capabilities to respond to threats from an external enemy.

Therefore, when considering the strategies of military planning and countermeasures, it is important

 consider not only military aspects, but also socio-political factors such as democracy, human rights and stability. Permanent support of citizens and high legitimacy of the government can contribute to strengthening military effectiveness and achieving stability both in internal affairs and in the international arena."

"Foreign relations: Russia's actions under Putin have caused tensions in international relations and conflicts with other countries. This may lead to Russia's isolation and more difficult conflict resolution in the post-war period.

Tensions in international relations may lead to economic sanctions and restrictions by other countries, which may affect Russia's economic development and military capabilities. In addition, Russia's isolation could limit access to technology, weapons, and resources, which could affect the country's military power and innovation.

The complexity of conflict resolution in the post-war period is also an important factor. Planning and implementing a sustainable peace settlement requires cooperation and trust between conflicting parties, as well as the support of the international community. The negative image and restrictions associated with Russia's actions can complicate the process of peaceful settlement and prolong the conflict.

Therefore, considering foreign relations, it is necessary to understand that the actions and policies of a leader such as Putin can have a significant impact on the international community and can create obstacles to achieving a military victory and a political settlement."

"Military Preparations: Increased military spending and activity by Russia could lead to armed conflicts and escalation of tensions in the region and the world. This could have negative consequences for security and peace.

Armed conflicts threaten not only the security of countries in the direct conflict zone, but also the stability and peace of the entire region and the world. The increase in military spending and Russia's activity can provoke other countries to increase their military capabilities, thus creating an intimidating spiral and the threat of conflict escalation.

Tensions and conflicts in the region can also affect international trade, the economy and financial stability. Armed conflict can cause a decrease in investment, loss of jobs, increase in prices of goods and services, which negatively affects the economic well-being of countries and the global economy as a whole.

Therefore, given Russia's military preparations and activity, it is necessary to understand that increased tensions and armed conflicts can have serious consequences for security, stability and peace both in the region and around the world."

Tags:

1. #Putin

2. #militarystrategy

3. #internationalrelations

4. #geopolitics

5. #democracy

6. #humanrights

7. #imperial interests

8. #defense capability

9. #tension

10. #conflicts

11. #mirtastability

12. #peace

13. #war

14. #politics

15. #analysis

In Geshtag:

1. #Putin

2. #militarystrategy

3. #internationalrelations

4. #geopolitics

5. #democracy

6. #humanrights

7. #imperialinterests

8. #defensecapability

9. #tension

10. #conflicts

11. #peacemaintenance

12. #peace

13. #war

14. #politics

15. #analysis

Conclusion:

In this article, we have carefully analyzed the arguments for and against the military-political leader that is Putin. From a military point of view, his experience in managing and preserving imperial interests can have its positive aspects, especially in the context of strengthening defense capabilities and implementing strategic plans.

However, we also considered the negative aspects, such as democracy and human rights, which could suffer under an authoritarian style of governance, and the negative impact on foreign relations, which could lead to tensions and isolation of Russia.

In addition, an increase in military preparations could create the threat of conflict and escalation of tension, which could negatively affect security and peace both in the region and around the world.

Therefore, this analysis takes into account various aspects and challenges associated with Putin's leadership from a military-political point of view, the presentation

considering both the positive and negative consequences of these aspects.

Просмотры: